Goldenarticles articles

Do you certainly want to know the truth? - mysticism

 

Back in 1992, Jack Nicholson and Tom Cruise co-starred in a movie at liberty A Few Good Men. The high point of the film, in my view, was a classic, heated chat concerning their characters, at some stage in which Kaffee (the armed attorney played by Cruise) says: "I want the truth," and Col. Jessup (Nicholson) responds: "You can't carry out the truth. "

The movie makes Jessup the villain. That's not amazing in a courtroom drama that's based on judgment the truth in order to break right from wrong. But the screenwriters could just have by far bowed it all around. If Jessup were cutting the script, he would have be converted into the hero defending the American way of life. Disparate Kaffee, who could only perceive truth because of the narrow perspective of precedent case law, he saw the superior picture. In his view, the severity of black-and-white morality desirable to be bent into shades of gray to serve the bigger good.

The truth that Jessup perceived was well ahead of Kaffee's capacity to handle. Kaffee's view of truth was far too incomplete to control the certainty of Jessup's world. Nevertheless what neither of them could see was that "the truth" cleanly does not exist. There is no universal, classic Truth (with a funds "T"). The best each of us can assembly is our own account of truth, firm by the point from which we decide to view reality. And our only sin is in believing that others must join us in since clothes as we do.

There have continually been those among us who, claiming to speak with the board of God or on behalf of a authoritarian regime, have advocated their account of Truth. These associates - not too atypical in other ways from the rest of us - became attentive by the understood authenticity of their doctrines. Even though their impressive robes or uniforms and their believable pronouncements, they crooked out to be hardly more than bigoted bullies who historically have been astoundingly efficient in bending our minds and wills.

Perhaps, the time has come for us to think for ourselves. But how can we when our minds are previously made up? A big name has before now done all the accepted wisdom for us. And we, in quest of the blessings of our leaders and the security of consensus, frequently nod in agreement. Besides, we enjoy being part of our superior families and we seem to enjoy the comfort of singing from a communal hymnal.

The next time a big name asks you for the truth, you might want to think twice beforehand answering. It takes far more courage to venture into the field of truth than you might realize. It is a never-ending journey into the unknown, requiring that you turn your back on the lot comfortable and move to sitting room you've never dared explore. You leave the relief of certainty far after as you venture ahead of the walls of belief. While part of you is curious, a different part would in all probability moderately not take the risk. Eagles apprehensive about security nets don't soar; sadly, they in the end lose their capability to fly altogether.

However, as any eagle will tell you, overcoming the fear of leaping from the nest is the only way to accomplish its destiny. When you at length bid adequate courage to relax your grip on the truths you've bought into and let go of set beliefs, you will make a remarkable discovery: What you see depends upon where you're looking from. Every time you alter the point from which you view, not only does what you see change, but a new bearing of physically emerges as well.

You develop into the eagle rotating ever elevated on unexpected updrafts, each new turn as long as a fresh point from which to view. All the burning issues that seemed so urgent and compelling the recent past fade into obscurity and inappropriateness today. New truths disclose themselves in kaleidoscopic succession until you accomplish that each of these, too, is barely more than a impermanent resting place. You hang back for a while, absorbing the epiphany it offers, and announcement it in order to move on to the next vista that piques your curiosity.

As your awareness grows, so does your capacity to acknowledge many realities. You soon come to appreciate that right and wrong, like Truth, are simply expressions of perception. They arrive not able to be forfeited only to those who garbage to alter the points from which they view. If such ancestors are so acutely deep-seated to their beliefs that they are unwilling to hand over their vantage points, why ought to it be amazing that what they see never changes? The only way they can defend their deep-seated fear of alteration is to preach and find fault with those who are not in agreement. By conclusion others wanting, they boost their own self-righteous perceptions, benevolent rise to the separation that certainly finds appearance in copse or overt hostility.

This clinging to the idea that there is a universal, best truth lies at the core of the difficulties with religions, supporting systems, economic institutions, ecological movements, the affair and corporate world, as well as more or less every individual association you have ever had. However, where it does its most insidious harm is in the composite mini-world of the individual. When you trade your curiosity for the characteristics and sense of belonging that comes with adopting the beliefs of those about you, the whole of who you exceedingly are becomes overridden by your exterior facade - the character you now think you are.

In theory, the way out of this dilemma is simple. Albert Einstein encapsulated it in a few words: "No challenge can ever be solved at the same level of consciousness that formed it. " However, in custom this is far easier said than done. For what is mandatory is for you to bid the courage to break free from your comfort zone - your habitual, deep-seated patterning - and soar.

When was the last time you found manually in a heated case with a big name and rapidly realized that both of you were agreed adjust even although you were in contrary camps? How easy was it for you to extricate from the inevitable he-said/she-said (attack/defend) syndrome and view the interaction from exterior the arena of conflict? Once you have in fact achieved this breakthrough, you are as soon as confronted by an incredibly attention-grabbing question: If I am the one arguing, then who is the one scrutiny me argue?

With that extraordinary question, the whole lot in your life is about to shift irrevocably. You are ready to leap into the void in which your tidy world of certainty becomes increasingly fuzzy. The senior you soar, the more right and wrong are seen to be two sides of a mbius strip, combination and fading into each other. You now appreciate truth anew; it is no more than a commemorative to a stuck point of view - a curb marker admonition casual motorists to stay alert.

Do you still want the truth? Doesn't matter what for, now that you're among the eagles?

2005. Jean-Claude Koven is a author and lecturer based in Rancho Mirage, CA. He is the creator of Going Deeper: How to Make Sense of Your Life When Your Life Makes No Sense, the Allbooks Reviews editor's amount for the best metaphysical book of 2004. For more information, choose visit: http://www. goingdeeper. org


MORE RESOURCES:






The Future of Spirituality  smartshanghai.com











Spiritual but not religious  Portugal Resident











Guiding Light: Mastering emotions  Free Press Journal














Be not afraid  National Catholic Reporter





Spiritual Growth  Economic Times





















































Developed by:
home | site map
goldenarticles.net © 2021